Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Doing My Part

Alright, Democrats. You didn’t make things easy for me with your votes on Super Tuesday. I was looking to you to make a clear choice in your states’ Democratic primaries so that some of the pressure would be off of me on Mediocre Saturday, when I will be participating in the Washington State caucus.

Usually, by this stage in the political game, there is already a front-runner, and my vote is nothing but symbolic. But this year, I feel like I really have a say. The only problem is that I don’t know what that say will be.

I am undecided. Really undecided. This is a new feeling for me. Part of the issue is that the two candidates on the buffet menu are both moderate Democrats who, more or less, propose similar ideas. But I also think that I’m struggling with something bigger, some larger question about what matters to me.

It occurred to me that, for the first time, I am no longer a “younger voter.” And I guess the issue is whether I am still able to feel like a younger voter and whether I want to. In the past, if a candidate said that he was going to have us all stand together on the top of a mountain and hold hands and find common ground across division, I would have followed him up the hill like he was the pied piper. But now, I hear the calls for UNITY! And CHANGE! and HOPE! and I think to myself, change doesn’t happen just by wishing it so.

Or does it?

Obama gives me the opportunity, if I’m willing to take it, to reconnect with a type of idealism that has been slippery and elusive. He is not the first to promise a new set of civic relationships, a new way of solving problems, a new world order of sorts that has capital J Justice at its core. He is not the first, but he delivers his message in a way that sounds so authentic, so real, so almost-there possible. I miss that feeling, and I am hungry for it. But I am also wary, because I know that we, as a country, have a crappy track record of translating good vibes into meaningful action.

It would feel right to jump on the sails of Obama idealism, but Hillary Clinton represents a different kind of idealism for me. I’ll be honest. It’s exciting to me that we could possibly have a left-leaning, competent, persuasive female president, even if we have to spend the next four years analyzing whether she’s too female or not female enough (Too many tears? Too few? Too much cleavage? Matronly pantsuits?). I read an essay by Rebecca Traister on Salon.com that has come the closest to expressing my feelings about the gender component of this election. She writes,

"…I think of how, when I was 9, my dad took me into the voting booth so that I could pull the lever for the first female vice president, and how he told me that he hoped that in my lifetime I would have the opportunity to vote for a woman at the top of the ticket. And I think about the fact that this is it -- my chance to pull that lever for her, so that I can do it again come November.

Who am I to turn up my nose at her because she's imperfect? I always figured the first female president would be a Thatcher-style Republican -- how can I complain about a Wellesley-educated Democrat who once resembled the second-wave women who fought for my ability to control my own reproduction and get paid as much as my male colleagues?

How could I ever tell those women that I voted for Barack Obama? What do I tell my aunt, my mother -- women who aren't crazy about Hillary's politics either, but whose extra decades on the planet have left them more acutely aware than I about the fleeting opportunity she presents. What if I have a daughter someday and she asks me about why we've never had a woman president? Do I tell her that we once came close, but that Mommy was really digging Obama that day?"

And so I struggle, but I sure am glad to feel the power of choosing again, to feel that a struggle is worth it. I have a sense that I will walk into the caucus site this Saturday still unclear about what I will do. Perhaps I will be one of those people who shifts position in the middle of the caucus! Wouldn’t that be fun?

Stay tuned. I’ll be doing a little filming this weekend as we make our way from the boys’ school pancake breakfast to the polling place. Live coverage of my indecision – it doesn’t get any better than that.

16 comments:

ecm said...

But is Hillary THE woman you want? Because it seems to me we should be considering that behind this particular woman is a man who will not be merely her lean-to and support system. I can't help but think that he will in effect be president all over again. Do we want the Clinton dynasty? I voted twice for Clinton, but I'm ready for a bigger change now. I believe that in our lifetimes there will be another woman out there, one who represents us better.

I'm going to honor my instinct and faith of my younger voting years. I'm going to the mountaintop, baby!

That said, I can't wait to see the voting coverage on your next blog entry.

jennifer said...

I'm not so sure there will be another woman any time soon.

And I don't know -- why wouldn't she represent us well?

Keep it coming. Convince me.

BrianC said...

One of the many polls shown on CNN on Super Tuesday talked about young voters being 40 and under. So for at least another month or so I still can be considered a 'young' voter. That means you are still a 'young' voter too. Just an experienced one. :)

Phthor Quiddity said...

Younger Voter Quiz. Please answer True or False.

1) Do you believe that illegal immigrants should declare themselves, pay a $1000 fine, and then be shot out of a giant cannon in the general direction of their country of origin?

2) Local driving statutes should be revised to make it perfectly legal to exit one's driveway into traffic using the following two-step procedure: place your Eldorado gearshift in reverse and floor it. There is no need to look where you are going.

3) Kids today make too much damned noise.

4) The primary use of shopping malls is power-walking.

5) Fox News is fair and balanced.

6) I have eaten dinner before 5 pm any day this week.

7) I qualify as a militia in the statement "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

8) One of the leading Democrat candidates has insisted on taking the Presidential Oath of Office with his hand on a Koran.

9) In any conversation this week, I have complained about service received in my last visit to one or more national retail chains having more than 500 stores (e.g., Starbucks, Walgreens, or Staples).

10) Despite the Social Security check I just cashed, the Medicare benefits I receive, and that $1000 prescription I just filled for $5, I believe that all the politicians down there in Washington DC really want seniors to be placed on ice floes and pushed out into the Bering Sea.

11) "Seniors" refers to persons who have reached a grand age of 65, not pimply 12th grade students or career-challenged college students.

12) I think 40 is the new 30.

If you answered True to any of the above, did you forget why you were answering these questions in the first place? If so, you are not a younger voter.

michael said...

Count me in on the undecided list. I don't have a problem with Bill hanging out in the White House as long as the elected President is the one in the situation room when the next crisis hits. It's actually this "next crisis" that gives me pause about Obama. Not that I think he would be bad in that situation, but I just DON'T KNOW. That said, I'm about 75% of the way to ECM's mountaintop. Trying to find a way to go to his event at the Key tomorrow to help make up my mind before the caucus.

jennifer said...

Damn. I was OK until #12. 40 better be the new 30.

cieux autres said...

Somewhere in cyberspace I wrote that I couldn't believe a woman was the front-runner for the Dem nominee and I wasn't going to vote for her. I would've put a fair amount of money on a woman betting a black man to the seat of power.

And yet, my wavering needle never crossed the line to the Clintonian pole. I read Traister's post in Salon.com, and sympathized (as only a girly man can). But I think what really persuaded me was Andrew Sullivan's piece in the Atlantic: "Goodbye to All That: Why Obama Matters"

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200712/obama

Aside from all the differences in policy and white papers (not that much), Obama represents a way out of the polarization of the Boomer generation.

Plus there's the really cool YouTube video that does make me a bit weepy and nostalgic for MLK and Malcolm X.

cieux autres said...

That and I'm convinced I'm part African, which means I have to vote black.

cieux autres said...

Oops, I'm writing under my pseudonym. I hope everyone recognizes me.
aka, Not Scott

ecm said...

I agree with Not Scott's comment about the polarization of our generation.

Also, concerning Hillary, I just don't like her. It's a gut reaction, I know, and has absolutely nothing to do with her ugly pantsuits. I've read too much about her and Bill during their years in the White House. I believe she and Bill leached money away from the Gore campaign so that she could win that Senate seat that would eventually rocket her to power. Anyway, the thing that I most resent is this idea in the article you posted with your blog. I should vote for Hillary because I'm a woman and she's a woman? Because she's a woman will she represent me better than a man whose positions on the issues are similar? A man who will make history as a leader because of his own background and ethnicity? Whose face reflects America's changes and progress of the last few generations?

Don't get me wrong. If Hillary is the candidate I'll vote for her. But I will knowing for damn sure that Bill is moving his desk back into the oval office, right next to hers.

ecm said...

whoops. problem with my browser, so my earlier comment appears twice. i'm really not trying to hog space. can you delete the second one, please?

Phthor Quiddity said...

I graduated from the same school as Barack Obama (5 years ahead of me) and Carrie Ann Inaba (a year after me). I hung out some with the the guy who founded eBay, a polite kid whose family moved among Paris, Hawaii, and the Mainland. (Yes, especially if you know me, that might make your head spin.) I could insert a misty argument about how people there learn to live beyond binary racial categories, or how we all have some ambition to make it on the Mainland, blah blah... (But I am certain being asked "so, how long have you been in the States?" drives all of us up the wall.) In that sort of crazily polymorphic environment you learn there is no one way to do anything. I certainly had no idea what it meant to be a white guy in the sense most Americans understand until I went to college, and I bet Obama had an (anti)parallel experience. If you want to understand racial and other identities, it probably helps to form your own sense of self outside that binary system and maybe end up with less personal baggage about it. (Well, maybe different baggage.) My guess is that Obama is less angry about issues related to his distinctive demographic feature than Hillary is about hers, which, like it or not, is what the electorate notices about them. She certainly has many axes to grind that are unrelated to progressive thinking. Angry people tend to get motivated by grudges and don't think clearly or fairly. You don't need to buy the mountaintop argument to get a-feared of the angry lady.

jennifer said...

ECM,

Just to be fair to Traister, who wrote the Salon article, I did post her quote out of context. She's writing about the conflict she was wrestling with, how she had to acknowledge to herself that gender does matter to her. And that's what I was getting at -- that when I'm honest with myself, it matters to me, too.

In the end, we don't know who Traister actually voted for on Super Tuesday. But you WILL know who I pick on Sat.

jennifer said...

OK, you guys, read this and tell me what you think:

http://tinyurl.com/3debmc

Lisa said...

How do you feel about Clinton vs. Obama now that the primary is a little further along?

I gotta say that I was also amazed that a viable female candidate came out of the Democratic side but I still believe that the first female president will be a Republican.

Personally, I don't think either one of them is going to beat McCain, but Obama at least stands a chance. I don't think it's possible to overstate how much people hate Hillary Clinton.

jennifer said...

I will admit to feeling happy that Clinton did well last night, even as I want Obama to be the eventual candidate. I want him to win, but I don't want her to lose.

I actually think that Obama could beat McCain (but I also never imagined that George W. could get elected TWICE).